A brand new benchmark for the upcoming Intel Battlemage GPU vary has leaked, hinting that Intel’s follow-up to Intel Arc Alchemist may very well be a real contender for PC avid gamers. This explicit leak includes a really low-power model of the chip design, but when its efficiency scales as much as bigger GPUs, Battlemage might reside as much as its title sooner or later graphics card battle.
For these unfamiliar, Battlemage is the codename for the structure of Intel‘s subsequent era of GPUs. It follows the Alchemist structure that has been used to energy the Intel Arc A770 and the graphics contained in the Intel Meteor Lake vary. The primary-generation graphics playing cards based mostly on Alchemist didn’t do sufficient to earn a spot on our greatest graphics card information, however indicators are good for its successor.
The leak comes from the database benchmark software program SiSoft Sandra, which isn’t essentially the most related benchmark for avid gamers, but it surely does give us a touch of this GPU’s energy relative to different chips which have been examined on this software program. The software program’s on-line rating database reveals a check run having been carried out on an HP laptop computer that lists its processor as an Intel Lunar Lake chip, which is the follow-up laptop computer CPU vary to Intel Meteor Lake.
Crucially, Lunar Lake is about to make use of a GPU based mostly on the Battlemage structure, so the final objective GPU (GPGPU) rating of this chip in Sandra offers us an perception into the general graphics grunt of that design, even when it’s not a gaming check.
Particularly, the Lunar Lake CPU’s GPU scores 2,108.15Mpix/s which compares to round 2,000Mpix/s for the Radeon 780M graphics in a Ryzen Z1 Excessive (as used within the ROG Ally and Legion Go), whereas the GPU in Intel’s Meteor Lake CPUs hits round 1,800 Mpix/s. So, on each accounts, Battlemage is forward.
What’s extra, this examined CPU is a a lot lower-power variant than the 2 comparability chips above. They’re rated to upwards of 35W, whereas this check chip is rated at simply 17W, suggesting the corporate’s subsequent era of cellular chips might actually take the battle to AMD with regards to future handhelds – an MSI Claw 2, anybody?
As for the way this would possibly scale to bigger desktop graphics playing cards, it’s basically unattainable to say. There will be so many different elements at play with regards to making a lot bigger variants of chips, as AMD reportedly came upon when growing its Radeon RX 8900 XTX RDNA 4 GPUs.
Nonetheless, it’s all the time good to see extra competitors within the GPU house, although we suspect Intel gained’t be offering competitors on the high-end of the market to pressure down the value of playing cards just like the RTX 4090. This is part of the market that Nvidia seems set to need to itself for the second.
